Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin may be the suspect that is main the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may not be a home title in cyberspace betting community, but he was infamous in his home nation for the wealth he earned by running their internet sites. Now, his kidnapping and murder have shocked the area country. Shih’s human body was found evening in Tainan County by police sunday. He had been allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and others that are several August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that day, Shih was acquired at the airport that is taoyuan Taiwan by his chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later on, the accountant at Shih’s business received a call saying that Shih had been demanding and kidnapped a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih’s family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three separate bank accounts.

Whenever the family nevertheless don’t hear from Shih, they contacted the authorities for assistance later that day. Hsieh apparently made an attempt to withdraw the transferred ransom quickly thereafter, but fled when he had been asked to provide identification during the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors who issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the nation, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand simply hours later making use of a passport that is fake used his photo but his cousin’s name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on August 18.

According to the United Daily Information, police noted that Hsieh didn’t have record that is criminal which made them suspect that another person may have planned the kidnapping. He did, however, appear to be covering his tracks, as he’d used his real passport to book a trip to Hong Kong. The passport that is fake been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to nevertheless be in Thailand. Nevertheless, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have actually been asked to assist within the investigation.

They also proposed that ransom might possibly not have been the primary motivation for the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a valuable view was still on Shih’s body when it had been discovered.

Based on a report from the Central News Agency (CNA), a human body was found in a mountainous section of tainan County with over 20 puncture wounds to the back regarding the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping occurred. Shih’s family was called in to identify the physical body, and confirmed that it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Full names were not available, but The China Post said that their surnames had been Lin and Cheng. According to police, Lin confessed to being fully a right element of the kidnapping plot, but claimed that he did not know anything about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified making use of surveillance footage, which revealed they had abandoned Shih’s vehicle in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked down on Shih’s Internet gambling band. That led to an 18-month suspended jail term for the man whoever fortune ended up being apparently well worth billions of brand New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had already been the victim of a kidnapping attempt four years early in the day.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars should really be allowed straight back within the US, but should face a quick exclusionary period first. (Image:

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural rivals, as the companies are a couple of regarding the biggest players in today’s online poker industry. PokerStars is by far probably the most well-known Internet poker site in the world these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has previously said that permitting the Amaya-owned poker brand back into the US would help all businesses, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has started to walk straight back those comments a bit, at least when it comes to allowing PokerStars free entry into lucrative American states.

According to an interview between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine‘s Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still believes that PokerStars is best for the entire poker that is american, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think they should get at least a slap on the wrist before they’re let back in that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to service players in the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a result.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

This is certainly just a little different from feedback published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is June. In an interview with that paper’s Howard Stutz, Mattingley ended up being quoted as saying that he desired to see PokerStars come back to the United States just as possible.

‘It could be like unleashing a gorilla that is 800-pound the market, but having more players on a regulated site would gain everyone,’ he said.

‘ We compete with PokerStars throughout Europe,’ Mattingley said of his rival that is largest. ‘They certainly are a formidable competitor. But they would make all of us work much harder also it would expand the market. I would much rather have a small slice of a large pie, than the usual big piece of a small pie.’

Those comments differed with people he made month that is last Global Gaming Business. There, he said he was still against ‘bad star’ clauses that would ban PokerStars from the market entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

‘ We must see the regulators saying which they can come in, but because they were taking wagers illegally for the people years, you will have to suffer a penalty where you can’t operate for a provided period of time,’ Mattingley stated. ‘we think couple of years would make some sense…as competitors, I think we must be permitted to establish our brands, which could be done in two years.’

No Change in Opinion, Claims Mattingley

Those apparently incompatible statements seem to have been clarified within the Bluff meeting. In it, Mattingley said that his position has been consistent all along, but that some of exactly what he believed to Stutz wasn’t included in the LVRJ article.

Based on Mattingley, their statements welcoming PokerStars back in to the US markets were followed by a qualifier that is big by which he said ‘…however, I do believe they got that top rated operating in an industry where everyone else was out.’

‘They really should not be allowed to walk into new states,’ Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that the exclusion of one to two years will be appropriate and reasonable to all parties, after which PokerStars should be allowed to compete like other people.

Packer’s Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a license that is 36-year the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/

James Packer’s Crown Casino in Melbourne received a permit extension until 2050 from the federal Government of the Australian state of Victoria, which includes defended its decision to allow for the add-on that is multi-decade. The Victoria national will additionally allow Packer to expand table games and ‘pokie’ (slot) devices in Crown casinos, in substitution for payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and groups that are anti-gambling called the deal ‘grubby’ and ‘back-door,’ and declare that does not have transparency. But Victoria’s treasurer, Michael O’Brien, said that the agreement would help economic investment and jobs.

‘This agreement provides significant benefits that are financial’ he said, ‘as well as enhanced competitiveness and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 individuals who work here.’

Crown casino president Packer ended up being additionally quick to highlight the observed economic benefits. He said that, while his business had invested $1.7 billion to update the casino, ‘it had for a time that is long at ‘a major competitive drawback on the issue of taxation.

‘Now,’ he added, ‘with the support of the Victorian government, we will have a license that allows us to compete on a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic benefit for the state.’

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello was among the many who spoke out from the deal, but.

‘ This whole thing smells,’ he said. ‘This close to an election, why would you are doing a deal without transparency, and with such haste, when it has major implications for the Victorian public? Australia has 20 per cent of all of the earth’s pokies, it has the population that is biggest of problem gamblers in the world, and yet this has gone through with no debate or discussion.’

Five governments that are future he added, would be bound to the deal. ‘I think the general public now possesses cynicism that is world-weary politicians, and they know massive political donations get to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, not a maintenance or increase of current levels.’

Crown said it would expand the number of pokie machines and video gaming tables beneath the new deal, nevertheless the number of pokie machine licenses would stay equivalent, because it would be absorbing existing licenses from pubs and clubs. Year additionally, the Victoria government also agreed that a ‘super-tax’ will also be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next.

Concessions towards the Crown

This last point, stated O’ Brien, allows Crown to compete with gambling enterprises in Macau and Singapore.

‘ This is a very competitive industry. We want to ensure that high rollers from overseas find an explanation to wish to come quickly to Melbourne to invest their money,’ the treasurer noted.

Nevertheless, Deakin University gambling specialist and researcher Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

‘ I see no explanation why the us government should be offering any concessions to Crown, it’s quite outrageous really,’ she said. ‘Crown has been methodically under-taxed for years. These sorts of concessions and deals must certanly be part of a election platform and should not have been brokered in today’s world, but this is certainly a characteristic of gambling policy. The government is really beholden towards the gambling industry, which offers them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.’

The deal significantly fortifies the position of Crown Resorts and this was reflected in the stock market despite negative publicity. Stocks in the business rose in the hours following the story originally broke.